AudioMasters
User Info & Key Stats
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
September 04, 2010, 12:05:50 AM
71039
Posts in
7443
Topics by
2265
Members
Latest Member:
marian33
News:
Buy Adobe Audition:
Pick Your Region
Austria
Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Switzerland (Dutch)
Switzerland (French)
Sweden
United Kingdom
United States
AudioMasters
Audio Software
Adobe Audition 2.0 & 3.0
Adobe Audition 3.0
AA3 - Lock multiple faders
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: AA3 - Lock multiple faders (Read 724 times)
«
on:
February 07, 2010, 12:05:05 AM »
rdforsyth
Member
Posts: 22
AA3 - Lock multiple faders
I've been trying to figure this out for a while now, and I can't seem to come to a conclusion. I have 4 guitar tracks, which I would like to lock in their levels, but if I moved one up, they would all go up equally, that way I'm not bringing up and down 4 faders every time.. I've looked around for an answer, but I can't find anything! Can anyone please help?
Logged
Reply #1
«
on:
February 07, 2010, 11:34:43 AM »
SteveG
Administrator
Member
Posts: 9629
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
That's what buses are for!
Go to Add Tracks, and add a bus track to your session. Route the outputs from your four tracks to it, and then just use the bus fader to vary the level of all of them at the same time. You have the additional flexibility of still being able to adjust the individual tracks as well, if you want.
Logged
Reply #2
«
on:
February 09, 2010, 02:15:39 AM »
rdforsyth
Member
Posts: 22
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
Adding a bus doesn't hinder an already drowned by vst mix does it? My FP can barely keep up to the VST's, even with my latency set to 40ms. DI guitars with amplitube 2 make for a SERIOUSLY taxed mix. I'll try the bus. I should mention that I'm using more than one setting of amplitube, otherwise I'd just use the bus to control that too. I'll give it a shot! Thanks
Logged
Reply #3
«
on:
February 09, 2010, 10:30:53 AM »
SteveG
Administrator
Member
Posts: 9629
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
Try locking tracks - this eases up real-time processing requirements somewhat, and you can always undo it if you want to change anything.
Logged
Reply #4
«
on:
February 09, 2010, 11:08:40 PM »
rdforsyth
Member
Posts: 22
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
Quote from: SteveG on February 09, 2010, 10:30:53 AM
Try locking tracks - this eases up real-time processing requirements somewhat, and you can always undo it if you want to change anything.
Do you mean efx locking? I was just testing that out, but hadn't put too much into it.
Logged
Reply #5
«
on:
February 10, 2010, 08:42:40 AM »
MarkT
Member
Posts: 1681
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
If you lock the tracks, you free up CPU, and if these tracks feed into a bus, you can still adjust the levels ( You can't change levels on frozen tracks)
Logged
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it."
— Terry Pratchett (Diggers)
Reply #6
«
on:
February 10, 2010, 04:09:41 PM »
rdforsyth
Member
Posts: 22
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
I'd just like to report in that you gentlemen have changed my life! It's been a bit of a shock going from 1.5 to 3, but I'm really loving it! With all these awesome features (phase on the faders, efx locking, levels for each track), I don't know why someone WOULDN'T want to switch.
Now, if they only released a full 64bit compatible version, that would be perfection. In Windows 7, AA3 doesn't use multiple cores even when they're assigned to the program for some reason. I think FFT and a couple other things are capable, but not everything. Very strange how they decided to do that?
Logged
Reply #7
«
on:
February 10, 2010, 08:24:56 PM »
SteveG
Administrator
Member
Posts: 9629
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
Quote from: rdforsyth on February 10, 2010, 04:09:41 PM
Now, if they only released a full 64bit compatible version, that would be perfection. In Windows 7, AA3 doesn't use multiple cores even when they're assigned to the program for some reason. I think FFT and a couple other things are capable, but not everything. Very strange how they decided to do that?
Cores are used according to need - if you used all of the cores for everything, the OS would seize up somewhat, so instead they are used 'appropriately'. You have to bear in mind that often, Audition isn't the only program running, and any other approach would cause considerable problems. It's worth using more cores for FFT-based processes, because the OS only gets efficient at these then.
64-bit processing has been debated before in terms of audio apps, and apart from being able to address more memory, it doesn't really hold any advantages - well not for audio anyway. Generally Audition doesn't have memory problems so I really wouldn't see that as any sort of a big deal.
Logged
Reply #8
«
on:
March 27, 2010, 02:32:09 AM »
MKB
Member
Posts: 42
Re: AA3 - Lock multiple faders
Quote from: SteveG on February 07, 2010, 11:34:43 AM
That's what buses are for!
Go to Add Tracks, and add a bus track to your session. Route the outputs from your four tracks to it, and then just use the bus fader to vary the level of all of them at the same time. You have the additional flexibility of still being able to adjust the individual tracks as well, if you want.
yep, I like the way they do it then just scroll along the bottom of the mixer view to easily see which tracks are assigned to which busses.
I tell ya, for all the things it's not, the Multitrack view still does a hell of a lot and more intuitively then most, Tracktion was the easiest to use initially, but once I dug into Audition's customizations a bit more it was clearly AA3 as the quickest and most effective if a bit limited in some areas. But when you get to know it, you just feel like this program is designed better then Pro-tools, unfortunately pro-tools stole the market in 96 before there was anyone to compete, it's been resting on it's laurels while Programs like Audition have begun to surpass it.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Forum Topics
-----------------------------
=> Forum Suggestions/Remarks
-----------------------------
Audio Software
-----------------------------
=> Adobe Audition 2.0 & 3.0
===> Adobe Audition 3.0
=====> Audition 3.0 Stickies & FAQ's
=====> MIDI
===> Adobe Audition 2.0
=====> Audition 2.0 Stickies & FAQ's
=> Previous Versions
===> Cool Edit 96, 2000, 1.2a
===> Cool Edit 2.0 & 2.1, Audition 1.0 & 1.5
=====> CE 2.0 & 2.1, Audition 1.0 & 1.5 Stickies and FAQ's
=> Adobe Audition Wish List
=> Third-Party Plugins
-----------------------------
Audio Related
-----------------------------
=> General Audio
===> General Audio Stickies & FAQ's
=> Radio, TV and Video Production
=> Hardware and Soundcards
===> Hardware and Soundcards Stickies and FAQ's
=> Recordings Showcase
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> OT Posts
=> Polls
Loading...