Forums | Search | Archives

All Forums  Third Party Plug-ins  What kind of plug-in do you want?

Author	Topic
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Fri Apr 11, 2003 11:06 am  OK, crazy question time: If you could ask the plug-in fairy for any CE or directX plug you wanted, what would it be? Josh _________________
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:05 pm  Waves TruVerb packaged with CEP. It ain't gonna happen though... but, you did say the "Plug-in Fairy"!!! _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
post78 Location: USA Posts: 2887	Posted - Fri Apr 11, 2003 2:44 pm  Voodoo, I get the impression that you still haven't tried Renaissance Reverb. I'm tellin' ya, you'll love it much more than that TrueVerb. _________________ Answer = 1. Probably.
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Fri Apr 11, 2003 4:59 pm  Possibly... I have spent alot of time with the TruVerb and have gotten comfortable with dialing in what I want out of it. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
DeluXMan Location: Canada Posts: 330	Posted - Sun Apr 13, 2003 2:27 pm  how about tube warmer plug-in with real tubes? :P Actually the "Art DI/O" [$99] has real 12ax7 tube distortion with digital in/out, so you get the best of both worlds. Just connect to your cards' spdif or optical in/out and use basically as a tube "plug-in". And when you're not warming up CEP tracks the DI/O works as a 24 bit dual D/A and A/D. Anyone had any experience with this beast? i hear the converters are good...
Craig Jackman Location: Canada Posts: 909	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 7:15 am  Waves C4 or Rennaissense Compressor. But cheaper. And native to CEP. _________________ Craig Jackman Production Supervisor CHEZ/CKBY/CIOX/CJET/CIWW Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 8:59 am  Quote: Waves TruVerb Quote: Renaissance Reverb Quote: Waves C4 or Rennaissense Compressor So, I guess it's pretty evident, the "fairy" should deliver a Waves Bundle with each purchase of Cool Edit!!! _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
Syntrillium M.D. Location: USA Posts: 5124	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 9:01 am  DeluXMan wrote: Actually the "Art DI/O" [$99] has real 12ax7 tube distortion with digital in/out, so you get the best of both worlds. Anyone had any experience with this beast? i hear the converters are good... No experience with the DI/O specifically, but I'm quite familiar with the ART Digital MPA (a digital out version of the famed ProMPA) and I can tell you that it's very good sounding. Actually, it's even slightly more 'dirty' (compared to some higher-priced tube kit) but it definitely achieves a convincing, authentic tone, and it's got lots of flexibity and metering options. --Syntrillium, M.D. _________________
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 10:35 am  Quote: how about tube warmer plug-in with real tubes? Any more ideas for plugs that don't yet exist? Josh _________________
zemlin Location: USA Posts: 1156	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 11:05 am  I think I'd like to see one that removes echo, removes reverb, removes vocals, removes instruments, can isolate or remove any single instrument from a mix, restore MP3's to their original, uncompressed fidelity, remove the flour from a doughnut, compensate for crappy rooms, make your $30 computer speakers sound just as good as $2500 monitors, and have presets that automatically find the correct settings for any input conditions so you don't have to listen to what you are doing. did I miss anything? _________________ Karl Zemlin - www.cheap-tracks.com Host of the World Wide Cool Edit Collaboration Procedural Debate
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 11:08 am  LOL! Don't we all? :D Josh _________________
zemlin Location: USA Posts: 1156	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 11:37 am  The holy grail seems to be a killer lexicon-esque 'verb that is priced for the common man. I spent $50 for the Ultrafunk reverb and had to think twice about that - $200 for the Renaissance Reverb is just out of my reach right now. $600 for a bundle isn't something I can even consider no matter how good it is. _________________ Karl Zemlin - www.cheap-tracks.com Host of the World Wide Cool Edit Collaboration Procedural Debate
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:09 pm  zemlin wrote: The holy grail seems to be a killer lexicon-esque 'verb that is priced for the common man. I spent $50 for the Ultrafunk reverb and had to think twice about that - $200 for the Renaissance Reverb is just out of my reach right now. $600 for a bundle isn't something I can even consider no matter how good it is. I'm with you on that! And since Ultrafunk is out of business, I guess I'll have to keep using CE's reverb. It's served pretty well so far! Josh _________________
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:43 pm  Not to mention..... if Syntrillium "packaged" a Waves Bundle with a version of Cool Edit Pro, the retail price would be in the neighborhood of $1,000. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
tomcat Location: USA Posts: 345	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 2:25 pm  VoodooRadio wrote: So, I guess it's pretty evident, the "fairy" should deliver a Waves Bundle with each purchase of Cool Edit!!! The Waves "Gold" bundle is awesome! _________________ Tom Robinson Production Supervisor WLAV/WKLQ/WODJ/WBBL Grand Rapids, Michigan
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 3:05 pm  Awesome indeed!!! _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
SJM Posts: 78	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 3:23 pm  How's this for wishing... ~ A plug in that would analyze the EQ of your mix and tailor it to sound reasonably good on all players (i.e. not too bassy on home stereos, or too tinny on boom boxes). Maybe it could include presets for various styles of music. I'm working on a large project that has many different instrument sounds on each song (even different basses). In comparing the bass from one song to the next, they all seemed pretty equal on my near-fields, and yet, when playing them back on an inexpensive player, a couple of the songs had no bass at all. Now I have to go back and forth tweeking and tweeking again. Wish there was a way to get there quicker. ~ A Syntrillium version of Steinberg's Freefilter. I know, I know...the old Magic Button...use your ears... It just seems to me that there must be some aspects about professionally recorded tracks that can be decifered and applied to ours, at least to provide a starting point. Thanks for asking, StephenJ
jonrose Location: USA Posts: 2901	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 4:33 pm  Well, if I cousld ask a "plug-in faery" for anything... How about a plug-in that can make your morning beverage and breakfast, do your recording, mixing, mastering, reproduction, marketing and sales for you, all while keeping track of receipts and payouts, doing your taxes every quarter and maintaining the studio, so that you can go relax on some uninhabited island in the Bahamas? Hee-hee.... ]:} Okay, I guess that's not so realistic, is it.... _________________
SJM Posts: 78	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 4:59 pm  I know it's unrealistic but the3jsgrve did start this thread with.... ------------------------------------------------------------------ OK, crazy question time: If you could ask the plug-in fairy for any CE or directX plug you wanted, what would it be? ------------------------------------------------------------------ I just joined in...making wishes...hey you never know, one day there might be computers small enough to fit on a desk...it's good to wish
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Mon Apr 14, 2003 5:29 pm  What would be really cool is........... a "talent" plug-in. That way, you could spare yourself the hours of sitting watching some person attempt a vocal track knowing that they'll never get it. You could just have them spit whatever out and apply a good dose of the "talent plug-in"!! _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Tue Apr 15, 2003 5:14 am  Hahahaha! Somehow I knew something along those lines would come from you, Voodooo... (turdpolisher extroidinaire) :P Josh _________________
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Tue Apr 15, 2003 5:28 am  I try!! _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
ozpeter Location: Australia Posts: 3200	Posted - Tue Apr 15, 2003 5:52 am  How about a plug-in for the forum which analyses questions automatically, searches for the last 50 times the question has been answered, and posts the links automatically? Or a plug-in that outputs to wave file from wherever it's inserted in the signal chain? Oops, it's already there - Silverspike "TapeIt". Thanks, I'll take my fee now. - Ozpeter
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Tue Apr 15, 2003 9:45 am  That talent plug would be great... but it would most likely put Antares out of business... ;) Josh _________________
ROBSCIX Posts: 254	Posted - Wed Apr 16, 2003 12:19 pm  How about a plugin which teaches "seasoned" users humility and memory of a time when they didn't know everything.
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Wed Apr 16, 2003 12:21 pm  Now what's the fun in that? :P Josh _________________
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Wed Apr 16, 2003 1:08 pm  Quote: How about a plugin which teaches "seasoned" users humility and memory of a time when they didn't know everything how bout a "reality" plug-in. That way when someone wants to spend their hard earned dollar on recording, they'll actually be able to hear that they have no talent and except the fact......... that's reality!! _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
ROBSCIX Posts: 254	Posted - Wed Apr 16, 2003 1:26 pm  You misinterperet what I said. I am refering to user just getting into CE and the whole digital recording thing, being humiliated by users with more experience....and it was just a comment not a flame.
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Wed Apr 16, 2003 2:49 pm  Quote: and it was just a comment not a flame That's cool, I didn't take it as one. I was alluding to the fact that there are folks that seriously have NO talent, yet have this dream of recording a CD, marketing it and getting rich. That's the beauty of owning my own studio. I don't try to contend with the "big boys", and I take what work I want and turn away what I want. I turn away more than I take. When I first started out, I would pretty much work with anyone that came through the door. I was trying to build up my cash flow to purchase more equipment. Now, I usually have a person, describe what it is that they want, how they wish it to sound and then have them either give me a simple cassette recording of them singing, singing and playing or have them actually sit down and perform something. If it sucks bad.... I tell them that I can't do it. I refuse to sit all day and subject myself to someone's denial of their lack of talent. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Wed Apr 16, 2003 2:57 pm  I can't wait until I can afford the luxury of turning away business! _________________
ozpeter Location: Australia Posts: 3200	Posted - Wed Apr 16, 2003 5:36 pm  I know I'm taking this thread too literally, but how about a plugin that did this:- Mixer plug-in which operates as 8 monophonic input, 4 stereo input, 4AUX, and a VST effect. Mono Input x 8 (InputCH 1- Stereo Input x 4 (InputCH 9/10,11/12,13/14,15/16) Aux Return x 1 (InputCH 17/1 Master Out x 1 (OutputCH 1/2) Aux Out x 4 (OutputCH 3-6) << Interface >> Channnel Volume Master Volume EQ Low , EQ High , EQ ON/OFF Switch Mute , Solo Panpot(Balance) Aux Send Level 1-4 Well, the plug-in fairy just left one at my door - it's freeware, "SUBTEK CMX844 VST2 MIXER PLUGIN (forPC)" from http://www.sound.co.jp/~tec/ Not directly useful in CE but within a 'modular studio' program alongside CE, with VSTi's and stuff, it's pretty neat. - Ozpeter
pundit Posts: 25	Posted - Thu Apr 17, 2003 11:25 pm  An easy to use Convolving Plugin, unlike the one that comes with CEP! If you guys want decent reverbs then convolution is the way to go. Personally I've always hated Truverb. It's far too resonant. Renverb is a lot better but still not great. What would you like? Lexicon 480L, 960, PCM91 etc?... TC Electronic M3000, M5000 etc? Quantec, Kurzweil... whether you want real samples from the hardware units or real spaces it doesn't matter. To be frank the convolution plugin that comes with Cool Edit just plain sux! IMO it's simply far too complicated to use. I realise that it was kind of an extra thrown in but these days convolution is becoming the standard if you want high end reverbs. I use Sonic Foundrys Acoustic Mirror and while it works well, it is a resource hog. Got to http://noisevault.com, get yourself the SIR Convolution Plugin, download some of the impulse files and you will NEVER use Truverb again!!
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Fri Apr 18, 2003 5:45 am  Quote: these days convolution is becoming the standard if you want high end reverbs WOW! I must have been absent that day. I would definitely be interested in some more information about, how it is becoming the "standard" if you have any Pundit. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
pundit Posts: 25	Posted - Fri Apr 18, 2003 7:03 pm  VoodooRadio wrote: Quote: these days convolution is becoming the standard if you want high end reverbs WOW! I must have been absent that day. I would definitely be interested in some more information about, how it is becoming the "standard" if you have any Pundit. Altiverb - http://www.audioease.com/Pages/Altiverb/AltiverbMain.html Sony DRE-S777 - http://www.audiomedia.com/archive/reviews/us-0301/us-0301-sony/us-0301-sony.htm Yamaha SREV1- http://www.sospubs.co.uk/sos/jun02/articles/yamahasrev1.asp http://www.yamaha.co.jp/product/proaudio/homeenglish/products/signal_pro/sampling/srev1/ Impulse sampling allows any hardware, software or natural reverberation to be accurately captured and then applied (convolved) with any sound thus 'placing' the sound in the acoustic space that was sampled. Cool Edits built in reverbs use convolution. Which is why they don't sound as metallic as most. However it would be nice to have a user friendly built in convolving reverb that allows you to import existing impulse files. You can sample any real acoustic space you like and create an impulse file from it. Any sound convolved with that impulse will appear to have been recorded in the same room that was sampled. Many existing DAW apps include convolving plugins. How about including a user friendly one in CEP 2.2? ;) ... or even just allowing importation of impulses into CEP's Full Reverb?
post78 Location: USA Posts: 2887	Posted - Fri Apr 18, 2003 8:29 pm  I agree that convolution is great, but I don't see what's so difficult about CE's. It functions in roughly the same manner as most any other. It doesn't have a "neat graphical interface" like Altiverb, but it still functions the same way. _________________ Answer = 1. Probably.
post78 Location: USA Posts: 2887	Posted - Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:30 am  I just noticed your mention of noisevault. They've got some great ones there. The Lexicon PCM90 impulses are great. _________________ Answer = 1. Probably.
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Sat Apr 19, 2003 8:32 am  That's for the lesson in Convolution. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
DeluXMan Location: Canada Posts: 330	Posted - Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 pm  I would like the CEP spectrum analyzer and phase scope on the stereo output and/or buss(s) during multitrack mix mode. For now i go into edit view and look at each tracks spectrum and phase one at a time, but it would be nice to put these functions on the output buss so you can look at the full output mix, or parts by simply soloing the track(s) you want. A plug-in like that would be great.
ozpeter Location: Australia Posts: 3200	Posted - Sat Apr 19, 2003 9:18 pm  DeluXman, It's Easter Day, and the bunny brings you... Quote: Spectrogram version 5.0 is a freeware dual channel audio spectrum analyzer for Windows 95/98/NT which can provide either a scrolling time-frequency display or a spectrum analyzer scope display in real time for any sound source connected to your sound card. Spectrogram allows unlimited recording and playback of the sounds from the audio spectrum display and can provide very high resolution spectrum analysis of wave files with a wide choice of frequency bands and frequency resolution and either linear or logarithmic frequency scales. Spectrum data logging capability is also provided. Version 5.0 replaces all earlier versions and provides improved audio quality, print-window capability, spectrum averaging for noise reduction and detection of weak signals, greater sensitivity, flexible display calibration, complete color control, and a new 1/3 octave spectrum display. Spectrogram is ideal for any purpose related to sound spectrum analysis. You can always download the latest Spectrogram update from http://www.monumental.com/rshorne/gram.html. ... and it will work with MT view playback (as a standalone program, not a plugin as such), if you set the Windows Mixer to record from Wave. - Ozpeter
DeluXMan Location: Canada Posts: 330	Posted - Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:46 am  Thanks ozpeter! Would this work with my Dakota card input monitor or patchbay, which doesn't use the windows mixer, and using winXP? it says it's good for 95 98 ME and NT.
rjt Posts: 91	Posted - Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:47 am  I think automation is very important, even when use CEP as a stereo editor. I use a different program for multitracking, but often do a lot of work on the loops I drop into it. I use CEP for that. Additionally, it would be great to be able to set the automation to a BPM parameter that you can enter in stereo editing. (I know you can do that now in your view.... specify BPM, this is for the purpose of editing). I would also like to see any plug ins be able to morph over time..... ie, you pick two presets and determine how long it will take to get from one to the other. A great reverb is always appreciated. Additionally, pitch correction and intelligent harmonizing would be a plus as well. Doing harmonization with format preservation or shifting would be awesome. I havn't tried this, but something like a maxx bass would be good. Finally, I have a couple of tube/warmth etc plug ins. It would be interesting to hear what Synt could do with that. Take care
rjt Posts: 91	Posted - Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:40 am  I was also thinking about an "intelligent" chorus. When you hear a chorus/string section etc., instruments are a little off pitch, a little in front of or behind the beat and the vibrato and tremolo varies slightly. In most chorus units, the delay of each line is a constant (line 1 10 ms, line 2 25 ms.... these can be set only one time), pitch shifting and lfo variable are also a constant. I would like to see a way of introducing minor random (or better yet, since musician don't tend to be random in their mistakes) not so random ways of varying these variables. For example, delay line one of the chorus could vary (triggered by midi perhaps or BPM0 between 10 and 20 ms, the amount of LFO sent to pitch could vary slightly over time etc. Make it sound like a more realistic ensemble. Take Care
the3jsgrve Location: USA Posts: 442	Posted - Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:22 am  Check out http://www.cloneensemble.com/ Wicked cool chorusing capabilities! Josh _________________
rjt Posts: 91	Posted - Sun Apr 27, 2003 6:16 am  I have the Clone Ensemble.... it is interesting. My favorite chorusing effect so far is the Ultrafunk chorus (too bad they are going out of business). Take care
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Sun Apr 27, 2003 7:38 am  I have the BassChorus V2.1 that is made by Clone Ensemble. It's kinda cool, but I use a Wave's Gold Bundle for almost all things of this nature. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
monopoli Location: Netherlands Posts: 33	Posted - Sat May 24, 2003 1:53 pm  I'd like to have something like Steinberg's Freefilter in CEP.
Chris Diack Location: New Zealand Posts: 2	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 12:03 am  Were in the Radio broadcasting business. We'd love to see a plugin which deals with Broadcast Wave Format information more intuitively, with reference to automated radio software, EG Simian. Example 1) You've just ripped a CD track or three in Audiograbber and the CDDB database has named the track artist and title information for you, and now you're top and tailing the audio, normalizing / compressing / limiting it where necessary, and now you're faced with naming the Text Field Names in the Radio Industry / Wave Information box in CoolEdit. It would make enormous sense to, optionally, take the file name and artist information etc., and import it straight in the appropriate fields in an "Artist - Title - Album Name - Year" format, this being the order of the data extracted from the CDDB database. (in my case anyway). The "Artist" information would be inserted in the "Description" field, the "Title" information = "Advertiser", the "Album Name" = Outcue etc., etc. Next we come to the "Intro" and "Sec Tone". I see no possibility of automating the insertion of an "Intro" field unless the appropriate information could be imported from a CDDB database as additional information and retreivable from there as an optional database field for Broadcast Wave Format users. Obviously someone has to create the Intro information in the first place. BUT here's where the beauty of a plugin could _really_ be of help, and that is for: Example 2) The "Sec Tone" function to be automated. To digress a little, The crossfading plugin made by SQRSofts Mariano Lopez, has proved to me that an automated crossfade point triggered by the outgoing audio track when the audio drops in level to around -15db to -18db is almost infallable. Please refer to http://www.sqrsoft.com.ar/en/index.html for a more detailed explanation. Taking the analogy that the fading audio is sampled from the finish and then analyzed back to a point where it has faded to -15db to -18db (configurable from say -6db to -50db) and at that point the proposed plugin inserts a "Sec Tone" n)ms from the end of the audio, you have the basis for an automated crossfade point to be inserted in the "Sec Tone" field of the Wave Information, suitable for triggering the next event in a radio automation system, such as http://www.bsiusa.com/software/simian/simian.htm If you're a program or music director at a radio station, the time savings of dealing with inserting Sec Tones in automated audio files is obvious. The plugin "fairy" would be blessed from on high, or, in my case, from on low, if it could be implemented. I may be missing some obvious points here, but in essence, the theory has been tried and tested for 4 years with the SQRSoft crossfader and is virtually infallable. More comments welcome from radio broadcasters... (and the plugin fairy) Chris Diack
ROBSCIX Posts: 254	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 11:11 am  I would like a plugin to mimic vintage equipment, like tube amps preamps, vintage EQ's..etc, and have the ability to patch them together whatever way you like
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 11:30 am  Quote: I would like a plugin to mimic vintage equipment, Actually, some of these things do exist. Drawmer has a compression plug-in that simulates their vintage compressors and limiters. T-Racks has three racks in their process that can be used seperately or in tandom. They all simulate the "tube" sound. They have multi-band E.Q., Compression and a Limiter. And, recently they released their product in a DX Plug-in format (previously, it was a stand alone program). Using CEP2.1 and it's ability to place effects in whatever order you want (and use busses) will facilitate exactly what your aspiring. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
post78 Location: USA Posts: 2887	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 1:49 pm  Jeez Voodoo, I have to remind you again about your Waves bundle. The Renaissance collection was designed to emulate old analog gear, although, I couldn't say for sure which ones... _________________ Answer = 1. Probably.
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 2:21 pm  Yea Jeremiah, I know but........ I didn't think that ROBSCIX was prepared to shell out $1,000 (I got my for @$600) for the Native Gold Bundle! FWIW, I still prefer the E.Q. in T-Racks to both Waves AND Ozone (which I also have). It really is a matter of being comfortable with it. I know what I want and I know how to get there from here. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
post78 Location: USA Posts: 2887	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 2:24 pm  I'm just givin' ya a hard time, Voodoo. ;-) _________________ Answer = 1. Probably.
ROBSCIX Posts: 254	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 2:40 pm  You thought wrong. Ozone..love it. I know this stuff exsists. I had something different in mind, hey isn't this a plugin dreaming thread?. Now if this is my dream, question is..who invited you? just kidding. what do ya's think of izotope trash? been trying the demo...kind of expensive, haven't tried it real time with a guitar though, hey now I have something to do for the night..
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 2:55 pm  Don't get me wrong... Ozone is cool and VERY powerful. The boss (wife) surprised me last year and bought it. I had been looking at it (mentioned it to her), but probably would have put the purchase off for a while longer. I've had T-Racks longer and am just much more comfortable with it. And IMO, it's not nearly the processor hog that Ozone is. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
ROBSCIX Posts: 254	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 3:07 pm  Have you tried the trash demo yet?
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 3:22 pm  No, I did check out the "Vinyl" demo. For "dirtying" things up, I use AIPL's Warm Tone. I only use it occasionally and for the most part on organ sounds. _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
ROBSCIX Posts: 254	Posted - Fri May 30, 2003 3:51 pm  Well trash is a Distortion plugin, seems pretty cool.
VoodooRadio Location: USA Posts: 3971	Posted - Sat May 31, 2003 12:45 am  Quote: trash is a Distortion plugin, So is Warm Tone! _________________ I said Good Day! Voodoo
	Topic

Page: