| Author |
Topic  |
midnightcreeper
Posts: 3
|
Posted - Mon Aug 11, 2003 8:14 pm |
|
|
I wonder if a program exist that can analize a wave file, detect the frequencie levels, high, low and mid as well as the loudness of the wave file (by matching it bit for bit and each spike) and basically apply the Eq setting and compression to the other wave file. Thus making the original untouched wave file sound like the better remastered wave file by applying the same effects? I wish I could explain it better but I know you guys know what I mean. Does such a program exist and if not why not and how hard would it be to write such a program? Anyone...
George
|
|
zemlin
Location: USA
Posts: 1156
|
Posted - Mon Aug 11, 2003 8:36 pm |
|
|
From the way you phrase your question, it sounds like you're asking for a miracle program - which, if it existed, would put highly regarded mastering engineers out of business.
I'm going to postpone answering your question and ask you to elaborate a little.
Rather than asking about a program that does this or that, how 'bout if you tell us exactly what it is you're trying to do - maybe we can tell you the best way to get it done.
|
|
ozpeter
Location: Australia
Posts: 3200
|
|
SteveG
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 6695
|
Posted - Tue Aug 12, 2003 7:48 am |
|
|
You could have a look at Steinberg's FreeFilter, which gets some way towards what you want, but I believe that there are, or were, some question marks over its use with CEP. But that was ages ago...
_________________
|
|
|
|
Makedon
Posts: 31
|
Posted - Tue Aug 12, 2003 11:41 pm |
|
|
| SteveG wrote: | | You could have a look at Steinberg's FreeFilter, which gets some way towards what you want, but I believe that there are, or were, some question marks over its use with CEP. But that was ages ago... |
Yeah, nice idea (that Free Filter), but not so good in reality. From what I know, that Free Filter hasn't been stable even with the Steinberg products, let alone CEP...
There is something similar from Voxengo (I forgot the name of the plugin), which is better, apparently.
M.
|
|
clothesburner
Location: USA
Posts: 412
|
Posted - Wed Aug 13, 2003 1:30 pm |
|
|
|
I know what he's saying. A virtual big brother that can analyze a mix after-the-fact and tell you the frequency ranges that might need attending. "You're a little heavy on the 80 htz range, Clothesburner. Why don't you cut a little of that off of one of your guitar tracks." Is that what you're saying?
|
|
| |
Topic
|