| Author |
 Topic  |
teflon20
Location: Australia
Posts: 474
|
 Posted - Wed Nov 06, 2002 10:42 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Webmaster
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 3:24 am |
|
|
| teflon20 wrote: | | What type of CPU are you running? |
Good Poll question. 
_________________
|
|
|
|
zemlin
Location: USA
Posts: 1156
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:14 am |
|
|
| Webmaster wrote: | | Good Poll question. |
and another that benefits from more than 5 choices. Thanks Webdude.
|
|
Noddy
Location: Australia
Posts: 93
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:26 am |
|
|
Hey Teflon,
What about Athlon (pre XP)?
|
|
Andrew Rose
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 875
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 5:20 am |
|
|
|
Another vote for Athlon
|
|
Havoc
Posts: 735
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 9:48 am |
|
|
|
Can I vote twice, it's a dual????
|
|
Cal
Location: USA
Posts: 577
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 10:02 am |
|
|
My write-in vote is: Athlon
Cal
_________________
Cal
|
|
|
|
SJM
Posts: 78
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 10:50 am |
|
|
|
AthlonXP 2100 and CEP2 likes it just fine.
|
|
djwayne
Location: USA
Posts: 583
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 11:19 am |
|
|
I have the AMD Duron 807 MHz, and it seems to work good with Cool Edit. I'm running 184MB memory, and a 10 Gig Hard drive. I'm using a Turtle Beach 4 channel sound card with optical connection for a mini-disk player, and a 12x8x32 cdrw.
dj wayne
|
|
MusicConductor
Location: USA
Posts: 1524
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 1:56 pm |
|
|
|
I voted Pentium 4 because most of my audio work is done at the workplace. But at home I do modest amounts of stuff on an AMD K6-II, which I notice has not received a single vote (yet).
|
|
dazco
Posts: 452
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 07, 2002 3:23 pm |
|
|
P4 2.4 gig as of saturday.....replaced an AMD XP 1500. Bought it because i had so many little irritations and crashes with AMD, i thought a P4 would be more stable and less problematic. So far so good. One thing alone that makes the switch worthwhile is the AMD would always hang at shutdown. Tried everything on earth to no avail. The P4 has yet to hang, and no crashes.....nothing. Granted, it hasn't been but a few days since i got it, but ever since i got the AMD i've felt there just wasn't a stable relationship between the chip and the OS. I may be wrong, but whatever the problem, i feel the P4 is more likely to be stable than the AMD, and so far it's been great. (the AMD has been problematic from day one)
|
|
Gulliver
Location: Estonia
Posts: 442
|
| Posted - Wed Nov 13, 2002 6:53 am |
|
|
| Andrew Rose wrote: | | Another vote for Athlon |
I guess I voted too early... when no Athlon's were provided on this poll.
|
|
AMSG
Location: Sweden
Posts: 594
|
| Posted - Wed Nov 13, 2002 7:57 am |
|
|
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ ...and I'm very satisfied.
But it seems that the pentiums are winning again, hehe
|
|
patb4365
Posts: 11
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 21, 2002 4:38 pm |
|
|
| teflon20 wrote: | | What type of CPU are you running? |
Single Xeon 1.8 upgrading to dual 1.8's soon.
|
|
teflon20
Location: Australia
Posts: 474
|
| Posted - Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 pm |
|
|
| patb4365 wrote: | | teflon20 wrote: | | What type of CPU are you running? |
Single Xeon 1.8 upgrading to dual 1.8's soon. |
I prefer dual [t:70a96cd465]Xena's[/t:70a96cd465]Xeon's.
But I am looking forward to Pentium 4 HyperThreading Technology cpu'zzz. Which is a cheaper alternative to xeon's.
Xeon's already use HyperThreading Technology but have more and faster internal cache. It all comes down to dollars my friend.
|
|
AMSG
Location: Sweden
Posts: 594
|
| Posted - Mon Mar 31, 2003 1:35 pm |
|
|
|
AMD XP 1800....and I was surprised that the majority (by now) used this AMD XP processor. I really thought most of you guys would use a Pentium 4.
|
|
| |
Topic
|
All Forums
CPU'S (this used to be a poll, but the poll got lost...)
